Are chatbots poised to take over disputes?

Algorithmic predictive solutions can give an early indication of a dispute’s prospects of success, such as Pre/Dicta which uses AI to analyse multiple data points and historical results to forecast outcomes of current cases, and which has recently found the judge likely to grant the motion to dismiss the Vanipenta v Silicon Valley Bank Financial Group class action.

Using Data Science for Judicial Analytics (Dan Rabinowitz, Founder, Pre-Dicta)

Pre/Dicta is an app that uses data science to tackle judicial analytics, but unlike other similar software, Pre/Dicta does not just look at a judge’s opinions and track record, but also looks at other factors that influence court opinions. The app looks into data like the judge’s net worth, political affiliation, education, work experience, and other biographical data points.

Pre/Dicta Expands Litigation Prediction Platform With New Motion Types, Case Timelines

By looking for a case or judge’s “doppelganger,” Pre/Dicta looks to predict the outcome of four new motion types: summary judgment, class certification, venue transfer and motions to compel. The move comes almost a year after the company acquired litigation analytics platform Gavelytics to offer predictions for state court motions across the country.

Pre/Dicta Adds 3 New Motion Outcome Predictions and “Doppelganger” AI Capability

Litigation Timeline Predictions: Pre/Dicta provides legal teams with the predicted case-relevant timelines from filing to trial to plan litigation strategies better, allocate resources, and inform settlement decisions.

The platform contextualizes its motion analysis, comparing that with the judge’s decisions, as well as other judges within the same circuit and those with analogous biographical profiles.

Innovator of the Year, Vendor: Dan Rabinowitz of Pre/Dicta

“[When I was practicing,] if you had offered me a tool that would give an actual, instant prediction on litigation results…well, I might have thought you were crazy. But I also know what a difference it would have made to my practice,” says Dan Rabinowitz, founder and CEO of Pre/Dicta.

1 big thing: AI predicts how judges are likely to rule

“We don’t look at the law or the facts — we entirely ignore that,” Rabinowitz said, because judges write opinions in fewer than 2% of cases, and in the case of newly appointed judges, there’s often no case data to work with.

AI in Court Is Ethical When Used Correctly | Opinion

AI Use in Court Is Ethical When Used Correctly | Opinion Dan Rabinowitz’s extensive background in both legal practice and data analytics uniquely qualifies him to speak on Pre/Dicta, legal analytics, and AI-driven litigation prediction. With experience ranging from serving as a trial attorney at the U.S. Department of Justice to leading fraud analytics and […]

Pre/Dicta Adds Timeline, Venue, Motion Types to Predictions

Pre/Dicta, a leader in AI-powered judicial predictive analytics, has announced significant updates to its platform, enhancing its capabilities for legal professionals. The platform now offers predictions for various motion types—including summary judgment, venue transfer, class certifications, and motions to compel—while also introducing case-relevant timeline forecasts from filing to trial. Additionally, it provides detailed venue comparisons […]

Legal Strategy & AI: Insights from John Quinn

EXTRAORDINARY AI TECHNOLOGY PREDICTS OUTCOME OF MOTIONS WITH 85% ACCURACY, WITH DAN RABINOWITZ John Quinn is a renowned figure in the legal world, widely recognized for his strategic prowess and a string of high-profile litigation victories. As the founder and chairman of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, the largest law firm focused solely on […]