Are chatbots poised to take over disputes?

Algorithmic predictive solutions can give an early indication of a dispute’s prospects of success, such as Pre/Dicta which uses AI to analyse multiple data points and historical results to forecast outcomes of current cases, and which has recently found the judge likely to grant the motion to dismiss the Vanipenta v Silicon Valley Bank Financial Group class action.

Using Data Science for Judicial Analytics (Dan Rabinowitz, Founder, Pre-Dicta)

Pre/Dicta is an app that uses data science to tackle judicial analytics, but unlike other similar software, Pre/Dicta does not just look at a judge’s opinions and track record, but also looks at other factors that influence court opinions. The app looks into data like the judge’s net worth, political affiliation, education, work experience, and other biographical data points.

The art of “judge shopping” is now a precise science, thanks to AI

An AI-powered algorithm advises lawyers and plaintiffs on how best to invest their resources by predicting how judges will rule in civil cases based on their net worth, political affiliation, and where they went to law school. It’s turned the art of seeking out a sympathetic judge, or judge shopping, into a precise science.

Pre/Dicta Expands Litigation Prediction Platform With New Motion Types, Case Timelines

By looking for a case or judge’s “doppelganger,” Pre/Dicta looks to predict the outcome of four new motion types: summary judgment, class certification, venue transfer and motions to compel. The move comes almost a year after the company acquired litigation analytics platform Gavelytics to offer predictions for state court motions across the country.

Legal IT Latest: Gen AI product announcements

Pre/Dicta’s proprietary algorithms use artificial intelligence to uncover judicial patterns. We’re told that its predictions are 85% accurate for motions to dismiss across all 94 U.S. federal district courts. The newly released augmented capabilities provide insights into additional motions through AI data-profiling. These include the most consequential motions: summary judgment, class certification, and venue transfer.

Using AI To Predict How Judges Will Rule

AI-powered database called Pre/Dicta is helping lawyers and plaintiffs predict how judges will rule in civil cases. The database uses around 120 data points to look…

Awesome Speakers at Legal Innovators California

he two-day conference, which takes place on June 7 and 8 at the new Bespoke venue in San Francisco, has top speakers from law firms and ALSPs, as well as senior inhouse lawyers and those in legal ops roles, and of course plenty of pioneers from legal tech companies.

Pre/Dicta Adds 3 New Motion Outcome Predictions and “Doppelganger” AI Capability

Founder Dan Rabinowitz built a methodology and an algorithm that is correct 85% of the time. Pre/Dicta has collected, enriched and analyzed more than 35 million docket entries, over 3.5 million cases, and 5.5 million parties and firms. This enables Pre/Dicta to generate a unique fingerprint or ‘DNA’ for each case and predicts judicial decisions.

Pre/Dicta Adds 3 New Motion Outcome Predictions and “Doppelganger” AI Capability

Litigation Timeline Predictions: Pre/Dicta provides legal teams with the predicted case-relevant timelines from filing to trial to plan litigation strategies better, allocate resources, and inform settlement decisions.

The platform contextualizes its motion analysis, comparing that with the judge’s decisions, as well as other judges within the same circuit and those with analogous biographical profiles.

Innovator of the Year, Vendor: Dan Rabinowitz of Pre/Dicta

“[When I was practicing,] if you had offered me a tool that would give an actual, instant prediction on litigation results…well, I might have thought you were crazy. But I also know what a difference it would have made to my practice,” says Dan Rabinowitz, founder and CEO of Pre/Dicta.

AI-Fueled Legal Analytics Tools Offer Both An Edge And Peril

Another example is Pre/Dicta’s platform, which analyzes a judge’s net worth,
political affiliation and law school alma mater, among other factors, to predict
whether the judge will deny or grant a motion. The company claims its
predictions have an 86% accuracy rate.

Shaping the Future of Law: Legalweek 2023 recap and analysis

What set Pre/Dicta apart was its unique approach. Instead of analyzing a judge’s past rulings to determine the likely outcome, this software collects, classifies, and analyzes the entire federal docket and every judge’s unique personal attributes including age, gender, resumé/background and political affiliation if known to determine the factors that will influence the judge’s decision in a given case.

1 big thing: AI predicts how judges are likely to rule

“We don’t look at the law or the facts — we entirely ignore that,” Rabinowitz said, because judges write opinions in fewer than 2% of cases, and in the case of newly appointed judges, there’s often no case data to work with.

Start up Corner: Pre/Dicta litigation prediction software

For years, companies providing backward-looking statistics dominated the litigation analytics space. Users relied upon those, despite having a limited value in providing accurate and reliable predictions. Exposing users to our advanced capabilities and the algorithmic models and AI is unfamiliar territory for potential users and, at times, requires background beyond our capabilities.

The Legal Tech M&As That Changed the Legal Tech Market in 2023

Pre/Dicta Acquires Shuttered Gavelytics: Late June 2022 was a fateful time for both court analytics provider Gavelytics and litigation analytics platform Pre/Dicta, which focuses on predictive analytics. While the former announced it would shut its doors due to a lack of financing, the latter officially launched into the market. Six months later, in January 2023, the companies’ fates were bound again: Pre/Dicta announced that it acquired Gavelytics in a bid to expand its state court analytics capabilities.

The Legal Tech M&As That Changed the Legal Tech Market in 2023

Using Pre/Dicta requires only that you enter a case number. It will then show a dashboard offering a prediction as to the likelihood of a motion to dismiss being granted. It will also show its analysis of similar cases. The Case Timeline shows likely outcomes for at each of the three states of litigation and the likely timeline to that outcome.

Legal Tech’s Predictions for Litigation, the Courts & ADR in 2024

Law firms adopting an AI legal prediction platform are experiencing a transformative change in their practice approach. They can now offer risk mitigation and case road mapping based on case timelines and outcome probabilities derived from billions of calculations, something previously unimaginable.

How AI in litigation will transform the legal industry

Today, we are excited to introduce Dan Rabinowitz, CEO and co-founder of Pre/Dicta, an innovative AI-powered litigation prediction software. Dan brings a wealth of experience to our discussion, with a background that spans from serving as a trial attorney at the U.S. Department of Justice to pivotal roles in data science and legal strategy.

A different kind of legal AI

So, when Dan Rabinowitz was founding the legal tech firm Pre/Dicta, he decided to focus on a tried-and-true method: behavioral analytics.

When Dan Rabinowitz was founding the legal tech firm Pre/Dicta, he decided to focus on a tried-and-true method: behavioral analytics.

Generative AI brings new insights to litigation analytics tools

Pre/Dicta collects, classifies and analyzes the entire federal docket and every judge’s unique personal attributes, including age, gender, resumé/background and political affiliation. Then, using what it calls “predictive AI,” it predicts the success or failure of a motion to dismiss before that judge.

AI in Court Is Ethical When Used Correctly | Opinion

AI Use in Court Is Ethical When Used Correctly | Opinion Dan Rabinowitz’s extensive background in both legal practice and data analytics uniquely qualifies him to speak on Pre/Dicta, legal analytics, and AI-driven litigation prediction. With experience ranging from serving as a trial attorney at the U.S. Department of Justice to leading fraud analytics and […]

Legal Strategy & AI: Insights from John Quinn

EXTRAORDINARY AI TECHNOLOGY PREDICTS OUTCOME OF MOTIONS WITH 85% ACCURACY, WITH DAN RABINOWITZ John Quinn is a renowned figure in the legal world, widely recognized for his strategic prowess and a string of high-profile litigation victories. As the founder and chairman of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, the largest law firm focused solely on […]